France Deploys 70,000 Police as Third Weekend of Protests Brings Paris Route Dispute
French authorities mobilised 70,000 officers as cost-of-living and education protests continued. A final court ruling moved the main Paris march east of the city centre.

France deployed 70,000 police officers and gendarmes on Saturday, 31 October, as demonstrators returned to the streets for a third consecutive weekend of protests over living costs, education and public services. The scale of the operation reflected official concern about a repeat of disorder seen on earlier Saturdays, rather than a claim that every march posed the same risk.
The French Interior Ministry confirmed the nationwide deployment, matching the force used on 24 October. Officers were positioned around city centres, transport links and commercial areas, while authorised demonstrations were allowed to proceed under security arrangements negotiated locally.
The mobilisation has drawn school pupils, students, trade unions and people concerned about household bills. Their grievances overlap, but they are not identical. Students have criticised school conditions, teacher shortages and access to higher education; other demonstrators have focused on pay, public spending and the everyday cost of living. That makes the protests harder to reduce to a single demand or a single political organisation.
Why the Paris march was moved
A late legal dispute made the location of the principal Paris procession an issue in its own right. Organisers wanted to march from Bastille to Nation. The Paris police prefecture barred that central route and proposed an alternative farther east, between Porte de Bagnolet and Porte de Charenton.
A lower administrative court initially set aside the restriction on Friday evening. The prefecture appealed, and France's highest administrative court, the Conseil d’État, overturned that ruling early on Saturday. The Bagnolet–Charenton route was therefore the authorised route for the day's main procession. The sequence matters: the higher court did not simply endorse an unchanged lower-court judgment. <https://lcp.fr/actualites/manifestation-du-31-octobre-le-conseil-d-etat-annule-la-decision-du-tribunal>
The authorities argued that the alternative route would allow people to demonstrate while reducing the risk of damage in busy commercial districts. Organisers objected that moving the march away from central landmarks weakened its public visibility. Those are competing accounts of the same restriction; the court's ruling settles the legal question, not the wider political disagreement.
A large operation, with turnout still being assessed
Police preparations also reflected Halloween gatherings expected later on Saturday. The Interior Ministry said some calls circulating online sought unauthorised evening assemblies and warned that such events could be dispersed. Its statement concerned specific risks and alleged calls for violence, not the entire protest movement.
Associated Press described a mostly youth-led movement and reported that many participants were protesting peacefully, despite violence linked to previous weekends. Reports about earlier clashes should not be presented as evidence that demonstrators taking part on 31 October committed the same acts.
The protests were not confined to France. Similar youth-led rallies in Germany highlighted education, housing and public investment, although the demands and organising groups differed from one country to another. Their occurrence does not establish that the movements share a single leadership or programme.
For residents and businesses in Paris, the immediate consequences were the changed march route, heavier policing and possible transport disruption around affected districts. Those travelling through the city needed to check transport operators' live notices rather than assume all services were suspended.
What remains unconfirmed: Nationwide attendance, arrests and any incidents occurring after the reports used for this article were not established at the time of writing. Those figures should be added only after reliable, dated confirmation. The 70,000 figure describes officers deployed, not people attending the demonstrations.